{"id":6448,"date":"2026-10-01T08:49:00","date_gmt":"2026-10-01T08:49:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/elnemrlaw.com\/?p=6448"},"modified":"2026-11-06T21:02:46","modified_gmt":"2026-11-06T21:02:46","slug":"third-country-deportations-are-back-for-now","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/elnemrlaw.com\/en\/third-country-deportations-are-back-for-now\/","title":{"rendered":"Third-Country Deportations Are Back For Now"},"content":{"rendered":"\n<h3 class=\"wp-block-heading\"><strong>What Immigrants Need to Know About the Latest Supreme Court Update<\/strong><\/h3>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">A major immigration development could affect people facing removal from the United States.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">On <strong>September 29, 2026<\/strong>, the U.S. Supreme Court temporarily allowed the government to resume certain <strong>third-country removals<\/strong> while the Court reviews the legality of the policy. The case is <strong>Department of Homeland Security v. D.V.D.<\/strong>, and the Supreme Court has scheduled the case for its December 2026 argument session.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\"><strong>What Is a Third-Country Removal?<\/strong><\/h2>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Normally, a person with a removal order may be removed to a country identified in the removal process.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">A <strong>third-country removal<\/strong> means the government seeks to remove a person to a country that is <strong>not their country of nationality<\/strong>.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">For example, someone from Country A could potentially be removed from the United States to Country B.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The government has used this policy to remove certain people to countries including Mexico and other countries that are not their countries of nationality.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\"><strong>What Changed on September 29?<\/strong><\/h2>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The Supreme Court granted the government&#8217;s request to stay a lower-court ruling that had blocked the government&#8217;s third-country removal policy.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The Court also agreed to hear the case and will consider important legal questions, including whether the government&#8217;s policy is lawful under immigration law, the Due Process Clause, and protections related to torture under the Convention Against Torture (CAT).<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">This means the government can currently resume certain third-country removals while the Supreme Court considers the case.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><strong>But this is not a final ruling that the policy is lawful.<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The Supreme Court&#8217;s September 29 order is a temporary stay while the broader legal challenge moves forward.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\"><strong>Why Does This Matter?<\/strong><\/h2>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The country where someone may be removed can become an important issue in an immigration case.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">A person may have concerns about:<\/p>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li>Safety in the proposed country of removal<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>Persecution or torture<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>Whether they have legal protection in that country<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>Whether they have previously lived there<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>Whether they have family or other connections there<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The legal questions surrounding third-country removals include whether people must receive an adequate opportunity to raise country-specific protection claims before being removed.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\"><strong>Who Could Be Affected?<\/strong><\/h2>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The policy concerns certain noncitizens who are subject to removal from the United States.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">However, <strong>not every person with an immigration case will automatically be subject to third-country removal<\/strong>. The effect of the policy depends on the person&#8217;s immigration history, removal order, circumstances, and the government&#8217;s actions in the individual case.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">That is why it is important not to assume that the Supreme Court&#8217;s order means every person facing removal can be sent to any third country.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\"><strong>What Happens Next?<\/strong><\/h2>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The Supreme Court has agreed to hear <strong>DHS v. D.V.D.<\/strong>, with arguments expected during the <strong>December 2026<\/strong> argument session. The Court will consider whether the government&#8217;s third-country removal guidance is lawful.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Until the Court issues its decision, the September 29 stay remains significant because it allows the government to continue certain third-country removals while the litigation continues.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\"><strong>If You Are Facing Removal<\/strong><\/h2>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">If you have a <strong>final removal order<\/strong>, are detained by ICE, or have been told that you may be removed to a country other than your country of nationality, your situation may require immediate legal attention.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The rules surrounding third-country removals are developing, and the outcome can depend heavily on the facts of your individual case.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>What Immigrants Need to Know About the Latest Supreme Court Update A major immigration development could affect people facing removal from the United States. On September 29, 2026, the U.S. Supreme Court temporarily allowed the government to resume certain third-country removals while the Court reviews the legality of the policy. The case is Department of [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-6448","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-criminal-law"],"featured_image_src":{"landsacpe":false,"list":false,"medium":false,"full":false},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/elnemrlaw.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/6448","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/elnemrlaw.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/elnemrlaw.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/elnemrlaw.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/elnemrlaw.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=6448"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/elnemrlaw.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/6448\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":6449,"href":"https:\/\/elnemrlaw.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/6448\/revisions\/6449"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/elnemrlaw.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=6448"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/elnemrlaw.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=6448"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/elnemrlaw.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=6448"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}